Skip to content

Commit 8d6335d

Browse files
jeremymanninggithub-actions[bot]
authored andcommitted
Auto-solve daily LeetCode problem using GPT-5-mini
1 parent 6cd848a commit 8d6335d

File tree

1 file changed

+45
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+45
-0
lines changed

problems/3577/gpt5-mini.md

Lines changed: 45 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
1+
# [Problem 3577: Count the Number of Computer Unlocking Permutations](https://leetcode.com/problems/count-the-number-of-computer-unlocking-permutations/description/?envType=daily-question)
2+
3+
## Initial thoughts (stream-of-consciousness)
4+
We are given an array complexity of length n and asked how many permutations of [0..n-1] represent valid unlocking orders starting from computer 0 being already decrypted (the root).
5+
The unlocking rule for computer i is: at the moment you try to unlock i, there must already be some unlocked computer j with j < i and complexity[j] < complexity[i].
6+
7+
I need to carefully interpret the rule: j is a label (an integer less than i), and j must be among already unlocked computers. Computer 0 is initially unlocked, so for any i>0, j = 0 is a candidate provided complexity[0] < complexity[i]. If complexity[0] is strictly smaller than complexity[i], then 0 can always unlock i at any time (because 0 < i always and 0 is unlocked from the start). If complexity[0] is not strictly smaller than some i (equal or larger), then that i cannot be unlocked by 0; it would require some other j < i with smaller complexity, but if no such j exists among labels < i then i can never be unlocked.
8+
9+
This suggests a simple necessary condition: for every i > 0 there must exist some k < i with complexity[k] < complexity[i]. In particular for i = 1 this requires complexity[0] < complexity[1]. For i = 2 this requires min(complexity[0], complexity[1]) < complexity[2], etc. Observing the chain, if complexity[0] is not strictly the global minimum (i.e., there's some value <= complexity[0] elsewhere), then there will be some index that cannot be unlocked. So I suspect complexity[0] must be the unique minimum in the whole array. If it is the unique minimum, then 0 can unlock every other node immediately, so after placing 0 first all remaining nodes are available in any order, giving (n-1)! permutations (with 0 first).
10+
11+
I should double-check examples and edge cases (duplicates of minimum, etc.).
12+
13+
## Refining the problem, round 2 thoughts
14+
- If complexity[0] is not strictly smaller than all other complexities, there exists some index i>0 such that no j<i has complexity[j] < complexity[i] (in particular if complexity[i] <= complexity[0] and all earlier ones >= complexity[i]) — that i can never be unlocked. So answer 0 in that case.
15+
- If complexity[0] is the unique global minimum, then for every i>0 we have complexity[0] < complexity[i] and 0 < i, so 0 can unlock any i at any time. Once 0 is placed (the initial unlocked computer, logically first in unlocking order), all remaining n-1 computers are simultaneously available and can be unlocked in any permutation: (n-1)! ways.
16+
- Hence the solution becomes: check if complexity[0] is the unique smallest element in the array. If not, return 0. Otherwise return factorial(n-1) modulo 1e9+7.
17+
- Time complexity: O(n) to find min and count and O(n) to compute factorial up to n-1 (or O(1) with precomputation if cached). Space O(1).
18+
19+
This reasoning matches the provided examples: [1,2,3] -> complexity[0] unique min -> (3-1)! = 2. [3,3,3,4,4,4] -> complexity[0] not unique min (ties) -> 0.
20+
21+
## Attempted solution(s)
22+
```python
23+
from typing import List
24+
25+
class Solution:
26+
def countPermutations(self, complexity: List[int]) -> int:
27+
MOD = 10**9 + 7
28+
n = len(complexity)
29+
# Check if complexity[0] is the unique global minimum
30+
min_val = min(complexity)
31+
if complexity[0] != min_val:
32+
return 0
33+
# If the minimum occurs more than once, 0 cannot be unlocked by 0 (strict < required)
34+
if complexity.count(min_val) != 1:
35+
return 0
36+
# Otherwise, 0 can unlock any other computer, so the remaining (n-1) can be ordered arbitrarily
37+
res = 1
38+
for i in range(2, n): # multiply 2 * 3 * ... * (n-1)
39+
res = (res * i) % MOD
40+
return res
41+
```
42+
- Notes on the solution:
43+
- We check that complexity[0] equals the minimum and that the minimum is unique. If either condition fails, return 0.
44+
- If the condition holds, the number of valid permutations is (n-1)! modulo 1e9+7 because after the (implicit) first unlocked computer 0, all other n-1 computers can be unlocked in any order (0 can directly unlock each of them).
45+
- Time complexity: O(n) for finding min, counting occurrences, and computing factorial up to n-1 (overall O(n)). Space complexity: O(1) extra space.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)