missing copyright and documentation license

[kosack]

The current license is BSD-3, but that doesn't really apply to documentation, only software. We should add at least a CC-BY-SA licence (https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/) and also a copyright notice, at least including CTAO ERIC, KM3Net, and SWGO. What are the legal entities of the last two?

[bkhelifi]

I agree that the final output, ie the web site and the associated PDF, should be more licensed under CC-BY-SA.
But the repo that contains the code of the documentation might be rather BSD-3. There is a distinction between these 3 products, is not it?

[kosack]

True - the source is restructured-text... is that considered code or documentation? I guess we need both.

[bkhelifi]

The code should have a s/w licence (e.g. BSD 3-clause), and the documentation (pdf or html) should have a documentation licence (e.g. CC). So, 2 are needed