cli fails to run after bpkg install: missing libcutl-1.11.so

[wroyca]

After building and installing cli with bpkg, the resulting cli executable fails to start due to a missing runtime dependency (libcutl-1.11.so).

Steps to reproduce:

bpkg create cc \
  config.cxx=g++ \
  config.cc.coptions=-O3 \
  config.install.root=/usr \
  config.install.sudo=sudo

bpkg add https://github.com/codesynthesis-com/cli.git
bpkg fetch
bpkg build cli
bpkg install -a

...
pc libcutl-1.11.0/libcutl/libs{cutl} -> libcutl-1.11.0/libcutl/pcs{cutl}
ld cli-1.2.0/cli/exe{cli}            
install libcutl-1.11.0/libcutl/libs{cutl} -> /usr/lib/
[sudo] password for wroy: 
install cli-1.2.0/cli/exe{cli} -> /usr/bin/
install -d /usr/share/doc/cli/
install cli-1.2.0/doc/css{default} -> /usr/share/doc/cli/
install cli-1.2.0/doc/xhtml{cli-guide} -> /usr/share/doc/cli/
install cli-1.2.0/doc/pregenerated/man1{cli} -> /usr/share/man/man1/
install cli-1.2.0/doc/pregenerated/xhtml{cli} -> /usr/share/doc/cli/
install cli-1.2.0/doc{NEWS} -> /usr/share/doc/cli/
install cli-1.2.0/doc{README} -> /usr/share/doc/cli/
install cli-1.2.0/legal{LICENSE} -> /usr/share/doc/cli/
install cli-1.2.0/manifest{manifest} -> /usr/share/doc/cli/
installed cli/1.2.0   

Run:

cli --version

Result:

cli: error while loading shared libraries: libcutl-1.11.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Linux fedora 6.17.10-300.fc43.x86_64
build2 0.18.0-a.0.82712fd2b433
bpkg 0.18.0-a.0.d8b5dce4bcfe
bdep 0.18.0-a.0.46c060102f11
libbutl 0.18.0-a.0.a7620d8f85fc
libbpkg 0.18.0-a.0.425f9913356e
libbutl 0.18.0-a.0.a7620d8f85fc

I can also confirm that libcutl is installed:

[karen-arutyunov]

On Fedora dynamic linker doesn't seem to search for 64 bit libraries in /usr/lib by default. Installing to /usr/local should work.

[wroyca]

On Fedora dynamic linker doesn't seem to search for 64 bit libraries in /usr/lib by default. Installing to /usr/local should work.

Installing to /usr/local unfortunately yield the same outcome

[karen-arutyunov]

Yeah, seems by default dynamic linker on Fedora doesn't search for libraries in /usr/local/lib either.

Probably the options are:

• If installing to /usr/local, then add /usr/local/lib to some of the /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf files and run sudo ldconfig after each installation or add /usr/local/lib to LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable.
• If installing into /usr, then also add config.install.lib=exec_root/lib64 to bpkg-create command line.
• If the library is being installed into a directory which is not searched by the dynamic linker, then also add config.bin.rpath=<lib-dir> to bpkg-create command line.

[wroyca]

Yeah, seems by default dynamic linker on Fedora doesn't search for libraries in /usr/local/lib either.

Probably the options are:

* If installing to `/usr/local`, then add `/usr/local/lib` to some of the `/etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf` files and run `sudo ldconfig` after each installation or add `/usr/local/lib` to `LD_LIBRARY_PATH` environment variable.

* If installing into `/usr`, then also add `config.install.lib=exec_root/lib64` to `bpkg-create` command line.

* If the library is being installed into a directory which is not searched by the dynamic linker, then also add `config.bin.rpath=<lib-dir>` to `bpkg-create` command line.

Thank! config.install.lib=exec_root/lib64 was it.