You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello. I have been using a different loudness tool to tag my collection for years. It's called loudness-scanner on GitHub.
I chose the loudness-scanner tool because at the time (~2019) no other tool supported multi-channel tracks and I have a few. In discovering this tool, which sees more development, I was considering switching. My test with a single album saw significant differences between the calculated gain. I do not pretend to know the math involved so I do not know who would be "right" or "wrong" on their calculation.
Example Track:
loudness-scanner:
Album gain, Track gain, Album peak, Track peak
-8.91 dB, -8.23 dB, 1.000000, 1.000000
rsgain 3.5.3 (Fedora 42):
Album gain, Track gain, Album peak, Track peak
-11.20 dB, -10.40 dB, 1.000000, 1.000000
Both tools claim to use a -18 LUFS reference volume. Is there anything else that may bring differences between these two tools? Any other comments? Thank you.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello. I have been using a different loudness tool to tag my collection for years. It's called loudness-scanner on GitHub.
I chose the loudness-scanner tool because at the time (~2019) no other tool supported multi-channel tracks and I have a few. In discovering this tool, which sees more development, I was considering switching. My test with a single album saw significant differences between the calculated gain. I do not pretend to know the math involved so I do not know who would be "right" or "wrong" on their calculation.
Example Track:
loudness-scanner:
Album gain, Track gain, Album peak, Track peak
-8.91 dB, -8.23 dB, 1.000000, 1.000000
rsgain 3.5.3 (Fedora 42):
Album gain, Track gain, Album peak, Track peak
-11.20 dB, -10.40 dB, 1.000000, 1.000000
Both tools claim to use a -18 LUFS reference volume. Is there anything else that may bring differences between these two tools? Any other comments? Thank you.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions