Skip to content

Conversation

@chrchr-github
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 5, 2025

@pfultz2
Copy link
Contributor

pfultz2 commented Dec 6, 2025

This is not really the correct fix. ValueFlowForward will check for variable changes.

The problem is that this comes from reverse analysis, so we need to traverse the subfunction in reverse as well. We don't really have a way to do that but we can skip the values that come from reverse analysis for now though.

@chrchr-github
Copy link
Collaborator Author

[...] but we can skip the values that come from reverse analysis for now though.

And how would we do that? Mark the values somehow?

@pfultz2
Copy link
Contributor

pfultz2 commented Dec 6, 2025

[...] but we can skip the values that come from reverse analysis for now though.

And how would we do that? Mark the values somehow?

You could check the tokvlaue, but it is a little hacky how we use that for the starting point (I would like to add an origin field for this instead).

Another way is to mark them but we need to mark when it goes reverse and forward as we do forward analysis from reverse analysis so the state would need to switch back. It should probably be an enum of Forward. Reverse, and Unknown.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants