Currently, test executions resulting from a @GoldenMasterRun will be named as [0], [1], and so forth. In particular with #16 it would be interesting to allow to give descriptive names to such executions that help to identify the input.
Similarly, it should be checked if "Run" is a good name for this test annotation, or if this rather marks a descriptor for runs or executions. Also, @GoldenMasterTest might be confusing to add to the test class rather than its methods.
Credits to @deeteear for the feedback.