Skip to content

conflict between custom-types from different metadatas #74

@mission-liao

Description

@mission-liao

Hi, I encounter an issue on Kusama when regsitering custom types from different metadatas, specifically, one is spec "9151" and another one is "9300". The type:[sp_runtime:DispatchError] in these two metadata are different

The one in 9151

sp_runtime:DispatchError {Type:enum TypeString: TypeMapping:[[Other empty] [CannotLookup empty] [BadOrigin empty] [Module [["index","U8"],["error","U8"]]] [ConsumerRemaining empty] [NoProviders empty] [Token sp_runtime:TokenError] [Arithmetic sp_runtime:ArithmeticError]] ValueList:[] BitLength:0 V14:true SpecVec:0}

The one in 9300

sp_runtime:DispatchError {Type:enum TypeString: TypeMapping:[[Other empty] [CannotLookup empty] [BadOrigin empty] [Module sp_runtime:ModuleError] [ConsumerRemaining empty] [NoProviders empty] [TooManyConsumers empty] [Token sp_runtime:TokenError] [Arithmetic sp_runtime:ArithmeticError] [Transactional sp_runtime:TransactionalError]] ValueList:[] BitLength:0 V14:true SpecVec:0}

sp_runtime:ModuleError {Type:struct TypeString: TypeMapping:[[index U8] [error [U8; 4]]] ValueList:[] BitLength:0 V14:true SpecVec:0}

The type of error field is different, it's U8 in 9151 and [U8; 4] in 9300, their length in bytes are different. The sp_runtime:DispatchError in 9330 won't get registered if I register metadata from 9151 first.

It seems better to separate those type registries (currenctly in global) for different spec-versions (even different chain, for example, using this library for DOT and KSM simultaneously). Do I miss anything?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions