Large Negative Values #91
Unanswered
tmedeirosa
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
When you say "It reads Correct the Phase 1, but Phase 2 and 3 it reads - 58 and -120..." do you mean the app shows those values? It's more likely a rendering issue. These aren't very large values (at least not large enough to cause problems). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
First of all thank you very much tomquist! Awesome tool!
I have a particular set-up, a bigger PV with its own CT's and battery which makes the automatic management of the largest part of energy.
I used the CT's for the other system to emulate a shelly pro 3em using your tool.
In your tool it seems is all correct:
}
Sending response: {"id":1,"src":"shellypro3em-ec4609c439c1","dst":"unknown","result":{"a_act_power":1061.0,"b_act_power":-1338.0,"c_act_power":-1687.0,"total_act_power":-1963.999}}
Received UDP message: {"id":1,"method":"EM.GetStatus","params":{"id":0}}
From: 192.168.178.29:10000
Parsed request: {
"id": 1,
"method": "EM.GetStatus",
"params": {
"id": 0
}
However I believe that the B2500 cannot handle such big negative values.
It reads Correct the Phase 1, but Phase 2 and 3 it reads - 58 and -120...
Do you have any experience with something like this?
Thank you very much!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions