Skip to content

Conversation

@luabida
Copy link
Collaborator

@luabida luabida commented Jun 10, 2025

@fccoelho I've removed the cffi dep (previously used in the read_dbc removed function) because it was not necessary anymore and has too many dependency problems with py3.13.

Another question, should't we release the version 1.0.0? I think the package is stable enough to a major release, with more compatibility and with no gcc dependency errors anymore.

BREAKING CHANGE:

  • remove cffi dependency

@luabida luabida requested a review from fccoelho June 10, 2025 22:07
@luabida luabida force-pushed the py3.13 branch 5 times, most recently from f9fdfbb to 695a2dd Compare June 11, 2025 03:47
@luabida luabida force-pushed the py3.13 branch 3 times, most recently from 352b27e to 98965e9 Compare June 11, 2025 11:37
@luabida luabida changed the title deps!(v1): python 3.13 release; remove cffi (gcc) dep; update readme; release v1? feat!(v1): python 3.13 release; remove cffi (gcc) dep; update readme; release v1? Jun 11, 2025
@luabida luabida force-pushed the py3.13 branch 2 times, most recently from f23b629 to 9d2d8b7 Compare June 11, 2025 11:52
@fccoelho
Copy link
Collaborator

I think it is a good Idea to consider releasing the 1.0 version. But first, we should see if we can unpin some key packages that may complicate installation, such as numpy and fastparquet. Thes packages generally cause compatibility problems with other packages that need their latest versions.

@luabida
Copy link
Collaborator Author

luabida commented Jun 11, 2025

@fccoelho done

@luabida luabida merged commit ae4e709 into AlertaDengue:main Jun 11, 2025
5 checks passed
@luabida luabida deleted the py3.13 branch June 11, 2025 18:23
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants