Input damages eta dimension #417
Conversation
|
|
||
| mean_cc = f"{self.ce_path}/adding_up_cc.zarr" | ||
| mean_no_cc = f"{self.ce_path}/adding_up_no_cc.zarr" | ||
| mean_cc = f"{self.ce_path}/adding_up_cc_eta{self.eta}.zarr" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Noting for the future that we should go ahead and make the whole filepath an arg in self so that these sorts of code changes aren't necessary.
| scaling_deaths = "epa_row" | ||
| scaling_costs = "epa_scaled" | ||
| valuation = "vsl" | ||
| elif mortality_version == 9: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mortality version 9 is a new one to me. Need to add this to our documentation. Also, we need to add brief comments in here about what each version means (or at least what the string values mean).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The theory behind the naming scheme is that versions 1-5 use VSL valuation and 6-10 use the same scaling deaths and costs, but with VLY instead. Version 9 has an extra wrench thrown in, which is that it uses a $2 million VSL in 2025 (2025 USD). This was an MG request for his book spec of the regional SCCs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, @JMGilbert! Is that theory on versioning documented anywhere else?
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #417 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.94% 68.98% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 15 15
Lines 1755 1757 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 1210 1212 +2
Misses 545 545 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
With the new mortality valuation using alternative incomes elasticities, even the risk neutral damages have an eta now. This PR provides the infrastructure to deal with an eta dimension in the input damages.