Skip to content

Conversation

@paveltomin
Copy link
Collaborator

@paveltomin paveltomin commented Feb 19, 2025

added https://github.com/marketplace/actions/pull-request-stats
to get updated stats - delete the comment below and re-run the CI

see also https://www.repotrends.com/GEOS-DEV/GEOS

@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 19, 2025
@paveltomin paveltomin closed this Feb 19, 2025
@paveltomin paveltomin reopened this Feb 19, 2025
@paveltomin paveltomin changed the title ci: Create stats.yml ci: Pull Request Stats Feb 19, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 19, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 19, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 19, 2025
@paveltomin paveltomin self-assigned this Feb 19, 2025
@rrsettgast
Copy link
Member

@paveltomin
this is great. Now we can have a quarterly competition!

@paveltomin paveltomin added the type: CI Concerns github workflows or generic CI label Feb 20, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Feb 20, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 18, 2025
@paveltomin paveltomin removed flag: ready for review type: CI Concerns github workflows or generic CI labels Mar 22, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Apr 15, 2025
@rrsettgast
Copy link
Member

rrsettgast commented Apr 16, 2025

someone explain how @CusiniM reviewed 6.7 million lines of code...I am pretty certain we don't have 6.7 million lines of code....and how does that not earn the gold medal??

Screenshot 2025-04-15 at 6 27 47 PM

@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot May 29, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 14, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 30, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Aug 8, 2025
@paveltomin paveltomin changed the title ci: Pull Request Stats Pull Request Stats Aug 9, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Aug 15, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Aug 22, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Aug 30, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Sep 9, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Sep 12, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Sep 22, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Oct 1, 2025
@GEOS-DEV GEOS-DEV deleted a comment from github-actions bot Oct 20, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2025

Pull reviewers stats

Stats of the last 90 days for GEOS:

User Total reviews Total comments Time to review Opened PRs Additions Deletions Revision success rate
paveltomin
🥇
47
▀▀
55
▀▀
15h 19m
32 9,546 13,815 0.84
rrsettgast
🥈
29
12
1d 9h 10m
7 2,621 4,095 0.91
MelReyCG
🥉
26
112
▀▀▀▀
3d 22h 26m
6 3,155 771 0.86
herve-gross 25
5
1d 4h 16m
1 9 9 1.00
castelletto1 24
16
4d 5h 59m
4 493 40 0.37
jhuang2601 24
10
16h 15m
8 1,508 177 0.88
dkachuma 23
44
▀▀
6d 16h 25m
5 2,747 5,426 0.58
OmarDuran 7
4
3d 18h 27m
8 64,335 1,659 0.43
victorapm 7
11
3d 18h 36m
2 21 19 1.00
arng40 5
7
22h 19m
16 5,492 2,608 0.44
frankfeifan 4
3
1d 17h 31m
3 14,260 1,985 -
tjb-ltk 4
4
2d 4h 28m
5 27,132 9,834 0.50
wrtobin 3
0
1d 14h 50m
- - - -
acitrain 3
0
35d 22h 23m
▀▀▀▀
- - - -
bd713 3
5
7d 18h 57m
8 15,748 3,766 0.89
klevzoff 1
3
6d 11h 6m
1 9,493 255 0.55
rasimHZ 1
0
11d 19h 27m
- - - -
jafranc 1
2
1h 14m
3 548 5 0.75
Guotong-Ren 1
0
17h 44m
- - - -
matteofrigo5 -
-
-
1 412,794 31 -
sytuannguyen -
-
-
1 1 1 0.50
chauj96 -
-
-
1 868 0 0.67
bmhan12 -
-
-
1 878 714 1.00
sohailwaziri -
-
-
1 4,038 245 -
danielemoretto44 -
-
-
1 3,435 30 0.13
Bubusch -
-
-
1 2 0 1.00
alexbenedicto -
-
-
1 1 1 1.00
RoyerJu64 -
-
-
1 992 25 1.00

⚡️ Pull request stats

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants