Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 22, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
typescript-eslint (source) 8.50.0 -> 8.51.0 age confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.51.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.50.1

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 22, 2025 21:55
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) December 22, 2025 21:55
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from a17361f to a2064d7 Compare December 29, 2025 21:02
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency typescript-eslint to v8.50.1 chore(deps): update dependency typescript-eslint to v8.51.0 Dec 29, 2025
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 9edd32d into main Dec 29, 2025
13 of 14 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch December 29, 2025 21:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants