Completed third task #47
Conversation
WalkthroughImplements many previously-stubbed kata functions across multiple JS modules, adds new React components (Dog, DogList, Subtitle) with index re-exports, tweaks VS Code ESLint on-save setting, and updates README checkboxes. Several modules gain exports; no public-signature removals. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Main as Main.jsx
participant DogList as DogList
participant Dog as Dog
rect rgb(245,250,245)
note over Main,DogList: Main composes DogList with hardcoded dogs
Main->>DogList: render DogList(dogs)
DogList->>Dog: render Dog(name, breed, superpower) [for each]
Dog-->>DogList: DOM for single dog
DogList-->>Main: rendered list
end
sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant ObjectsArrays as 1-objects-and-arrays/kata.js
participant DataStructures as 3-data-structures/*
Caller->>ObjectsArrays: addName(obj, name)
ObjectsArrays-->>Caller: newObj (spread copy)
Caller->>ObjectsArrays: replaceItemAtIndex(arr, idx, item)
ObjectsArrays-->>Caller: newArr (item replaced)
Caller->>DataStructures: where(arr, {k:v,...})
DataStructures-->>Caller: matches[]
Caller->>DataStructures: find(arr, {k:v})
DataStructures-->>Caller: firstMatch | undefined
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~30 minutes Attention points:
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Disabled knowledge base sources:
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🪛 LanguageToolREADME.md[uncategorized] ~23-~23: Did you mean “JavaScript” (= programming language)? (JAVA_SCRIPT) 🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
3-JSKata/README.md (1)
85-88: Tiny copy edit: pluralize “Objects”.Consider “Objects and arrays” for correctness and consistency.
- - [x] [Object and arrays](./1-objects-and-arrays/README.md) (2hrs) + - [x] [Objects and arrays](./1-objects-and-arrays/README.md) (2hrs)README.md (1)
21-23: Copy edit: standardize “JavaScript Katas”.Current text has spacing and an apostrophe. Suggest the common form below.
- - [x] 3. [Java Script Kata's](/3-JSKata/README.md) (8hrs) + - [x] 3. [JavaScript Katas](/3-JSKata/README.md) (8hrs)3-JSKata/3-data-structures/positions.js (1)
1-7: LGTM; optionally guard empty/non-array inputs.If you want safer helpers, return undefined for non-arrays or empty arrays.
-function getFirst(arr) { - return arr[0] -} +function getFirst(arr) { + return Array.isArray(arr) ? arr[0] : undefined +} -function getLast(arr) { - return arr[arr.length - 1] -} +function getLast(arr) { + return Array.isArray(arr) && arr.length ? arr[arr.length - 1] : undefined +}3-JSKata/3-data-structures/matrix.js (1)
1-8: Validate n and simplify constructionGuard invalid n and use Array.from for clarity/perf.
-function getMatrix(n) { - let newMatrix = [] - for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) { - const row = Array(n).fill(0) - newMatrix.push(row) - } - return newMatrix -} +function getMatrix(n) { + if (!Number.isInteger(n) || n < 0) throw new TypeError('n must be a non-negative integer') + return Array.from({ length: n }, () => Array(n).fill(0)) +}3-JSKata/1-objects-and-arrays/kata.js (1)
141-149: Prefer strict equality and for...ofAvoid coercion and use direct element iteration.
function deleteItem(arr, item) { - let newArr = [] - for (const i in arr) { - if (arr[i] != item) { - newArr.push(arr[i]) - } - } - return newArr + const newArr = [] + for (const el of arr) { + if (el !== item) newArr.push(el) + } + return newArr }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
.vscode/settings.json(1 hunks)3-JSKata/1-objects-and-arrays/kata.js(2 hunks)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/utilities.js(1 hunks)3-JSKata/3-data-structures/find.js(1 hunks)3-JSKata/3-data-structures/getPropTypes.js(1 hunks)3-JSKata/3-data-structures/getType.js(1 hunks)3-JSKata/3-data-structures/getValue.js(1 hunks)3-JSKata/3-data-structures/matrix.js(1 hunks)3-JSKata/3-data-structures/positions.js(1 hunks)3-JSKata/3-data-structures/where.js(1 hunks)3-JSKata/4-types/functions.js(1 hunks)3-JSKata/4-types/types.js(1 hunks)3-JSKata/README.md(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (9)
3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/utilities.js (12)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/3-tests/getType.test.js (1)
getType(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/getType.test.js (1)
getType(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/isNumber.test.js (1)
isNumber(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/toNumber.test.js (1)
toNumber(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/isStringNumber.test.js (1)
isStringNumber(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/add.test.js (1)
add(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/addStrings.test.js (1)
addStrings(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/addStringsOrNumbers.test.js (1)
addStringsOrNumbers(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/isEmail.test.js (1)
isEmail(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/countIf.test.js (1)
countIf(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/filterStringsWithCommas.test.js (1)
filterStringsWithCommas(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/splitStringByCommas.test.js (2)
filterStringsWithCommas(2-2)splitStringByCommas(1-1)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/getType.js (2)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/3-tests/getType.test.js (1)
getType(1-1)3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/2-tests/getType.test.js (1)
getType(1-1)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/matrix.js (1)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/3-tests/matrix.test.js (1)
matrix(1-1)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/getValue.js (1)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/3-tests/getValue.test.js (1)
getValue(1-1)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/getPropTypes.js (1)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/3-tests/getPropTypes.test.js (1)
getPropTypes(1-1)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/find.js (2)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/3-tests/find.test.js (1)
find(2-2)3-JSKata/3-data-structures/where.js (1)
searchKey(3-3)
3-JSKata/4-types/functions.js (1)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/matrix.js (1)
i(3-3)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/where.js (1)
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/3-tests/where.test.js (1)
where(2-2)
3-JSKata/1-objects-and-arrays/kata.js (2)
3-JSKata/1-objects-and-arrays/1-tests/addName.test.js (2)
name(5-5)obj(6-8)3-JSKata/1-objects-and-arrays/1-tests/hasItem.test.js (2)
arr(5-5)arr(16-16)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.vscode/settings.json (1)
8-10: Confirm intended ESLint behavior on save."explicit" disables auto-fix on save and only runs when you trigger “Fix all”. If you intended auto-fix on save, set it to true instead.
- "source.fixAll.eslint": "explicit" + "source.fixAll.eslint": true3-JSKata/3-data-structures/getValue.js (1)
1-3: LGTM.Simple and correct for the kata.
3-JSKata/3-data-structures/getType.js (1)
1-3: LGTM with a note on edge cases.typeof null === 'object' and arrays return 'object'. If tests ever need special handling, consider detecting those explicitly.
3-JSKata/4-types/types.js (1)
1-34: LGTMSimple getters match intent; no issues spotted.
| function ageOneYear(obj) { | ||
| console.log(obj) | ||
| let newObj = { | ||
| ...obj, | ||
| age: obj['age'] + 1, | ||
| } | ||
| console.log(newObj) | ||
|
|
||
| return newObj | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove debug logging and streamline
console.log calls are noisy in library code. Simplify return.
-function ageOneYear(obj) {
- console.log(obj)
- let newObj = {
- ...obj,
- age: obj['age'] + 1,
- }
- console.log(newObj)
-
- return newObj
-}
+function ageOneYear(obj) {
+ return { ...obj, age: obj.age + 1 }
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function ageOneYear(obj) { | |
| console.log(obj) | |
| let newObj = { | |
| ...obj, | |
| age: obj['age'] + 1, | |
| } | |
| console.log(newObj) | |
| return newObj | |
| } | |
| function ageOneYear(obj) { | |
| return { ...obj, age: obj.age + 1 } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 3-JSKata/1-objects-and-arrays/kata.js around lines 13 to 22, remove the two
console.log debugging lines and simplify the function to return the updated
object directly; replace the current creation of newObj and intermediate logs by
returning a new object that spreads obj and sets age to obj.age + 1 (no logging,
no unused variables).
| function getItemAtIndex(arr, idx) { | ||
| if (arr[idx]) { | ||
| return arr[idx] | ||
| } else { | ||
| return Error() | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Index existence check is incorrect
arr[idx] fails for falsy values (0, '', false). Check bounds instead.
function getItemAtIndex(arr, idx) {
- if (arr[idx]) {
- return arr[idx]
- } else {
- return Error()
- }
+ if (Number.isInteger(idx) && idx >= 0 && idx < arr.length) return arr[idx]
+ return Error()
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function getItemAtIndex(arr, idx) { | |
| if (arr[idx]) { | |
| return arr[idx] | |
| } else { | |
| return Error() | |
| } | |
| } | |
| function getItemAtIndex(arr, idx) { | |
| if (Number.isInteger(idx) && idx >= 0 && idx < arr.length) return arr[idx] | |
| return Error() | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 3-JSKata/1-objects-and-arrays/kata.js around lines 107 to 113, the current
existence check uses arr[idx] which rejects valid falsy values (0, '', false);
replace it with an explicit bounds check (e.g. idx >= 0 && idx < arr.length) so
valid falsy entries are returned, and return the item when in-bounds otherwise
return a new Error (or appropriate error value/message).
| function findAll(arr, search) { | ||
| let newArr = [] | ||
| let key = Object.keys(search)[0] | ||
| let value = search[key] | ||
| for (obj of arr) { | ||
| if (obj[key] == value) { | ||
| newArr.push(obj) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return newArr | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Implicit global in for-of loop
obj is undeclared; declare it.
function findAll(arr, search) {
- let newArr = []
- let key = Object.keys(search)[0]
- let value = search[key]
- for (obj of arr) {
+ let newArr = []
+ let key = Object.keys(search)[0]
+ let value = search[key]
+ for (const obj of arr) {
if (obj[key] == value) {
newArr.push(obj)
}
}
return newArr
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function findAll(arr, search) { | |
| let newArr = [] | |
| let key = Object.keys(search)[0] | |
| let value = search[key] | |
| for (obj of arr) { | |
| if (obj[key] == value) { | |
| newArr.push(obj) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return newArr | |
| } | |
| function findAll(arr, search) { | |
| let newArr = [] | |
| let key = Object.keys(search)[0] | |
| let value = search[key] | |
| for (const obj of arr) { | |
| if (obj[key] == value) { | |
| newArr.push(obj) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return newArr | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 3-JSKata/1-objects-and-arrays/kata.js around lines 182 to 192, the for-of
loop uses an undeclared variable obj causing an implicit global; declare the
loop variable (e.g., change to "for (const obj of arr)" or "for (let obj of
arr)") to avoid polluting global scope and ensure proper block scoping.
| function isStringNumber(str) { | ||
| return typeof str == 'string' && !isNaN(str) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Tighten numeric string check
Current logic treats whitespace-only strings as numbers. Use trim + Number.isFinite.
-function isStringNumber(str) {
- return typeof str == 'string' && !isNaN(str)
-}
+function isStringNumber(str) {
+ return typeof str === 'string' && str.trim() !== '' && Number.isFinite(Number(str))
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function isStringNumber(str) { | |
| return typeof str == 'string' && !isNaN(str) | |
| } | |
| function isStringNumber(str) { | |
| return typeof str === 'string' | |
| && str.trim() !== '' | |
| && Number.isFinite(Number(str)) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/utilities.js around lines 13-15, the
isStringNumber implementation treats whitespace-only strings as numbers; change
the check to first ensure str is a string, then call str.trim() and if the
trimmed string is non-empty convert it with Number(...) and use
Number.isFinite(...) to verify it's a finite numeric value (i.e., return typeof
str === 'string' && str.trim() !== '' && Number.isFinite(Number(str.trim()))).
| function isEmail(str) { | ||
| console.log | ||
| const emailRegex = /.+@.+\..+/ | ||
| return emailRegex.test(str) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove stray console.log and anchor regex
The bare console.log is a no-op and may fail linting. Anchor the regex to reduce false positives.
-function isEmail(str) {
- console.log
- const emailRegex = /.+@.+\..+/
- return emailRegex.test(str)
-}
+function isEmail(str) {
+ const emailRegex = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/
+ return emailRegex.test(str)
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function isEmail(str) { | |
| console.log | |
| const emailRegex = /.+@.+\..+/ | |
| return emailRegex.test(str) | |
| } | |
| function isEmail(str) { | |
| const emailRegex = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/ | |
| return emailRegex.test(str) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 3-JSKata/2-strings-and-numbers/utilities.js around lines 33 to 37, remove the
stray bare console.log call and anchor the email regex to avoid false positives;
replace the regex /.+@.+\..+/ with an anchored pattern like /^.+@.+\..+$/ (or a
tighter RFC-compliant pattern if desired) and keep the function returning
emailRegex.test(str).
| function updateMatrix(matrix, coords, value) { | ||
| const x = coords[0] | ||
| const y = coords[1] | ||
| matrix[x][y] = value | ||
| return matrix | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Bounds/input checks for coords
Access without validation can throw or corrupt state. Add type/bounds checks.
-function updateMatrix(matrix, coords, value) {
- const x = coords[0]
- const y = coords[1]
- matrix[x][y] = value
- return matrix
-}
+function updateMatrix(matrix, coords, value) {
+ const [x, y] = coords
+ if (!Array.isArray(matrix) || !Array.isArray(matrix[x])) throw new TypeError('matrix must be a 2D array')
+ if (!Number.isInteger(x) || !Number.isInteger(y) || x < 0 || y < 0 || x >= matrix.length || y >= matrix[x].length) {
+ throw new RangeError('coords out of bounds')
+ }
+ matrix[x][y] = value
+ return matrix
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function updateMatrix(matrix, coords, value) { | |
| const x = coords[0] | |
| const y = coords[1] | |
| matrix[x][y] = value | |
| return matrix | |
| } | |
| function updateMatrix(matrix, coords, value) { | |
| const [x, y] = coords | |
| if (!Array.isArray(matrix) || !Array.isArray(matrix[x])) throw new TypeError('matrix must be a 2D array') | |
| if ( | |
| !Number.isInteger(x) || | |
| !Number.isInteger(y) || | |
| x < 0 || | |
| y < 0 || | |
| x >= matrix.length || | |
| y >= matrix[x].length | |
| ) { | |
| throw new RangeError('coords out of bounds') | |
| } | |
| matrix[x][y] = value | |
| return matrix | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 3-JSKata/3-data-structures/matrix.js around lines 10 to 15, the updateMatrix
function writes to matrix[x][y] without validating coords or types; add input
and bounds checks: verify matrix is an array of arrays, coords is an array/tuple
of two finite integers, and value is acceptable for your domain; check 0 <= x <
matrix.length and 0 <= y < matrix[x].length (or handle ragged rows) and throw a
clear TypeError/RangeError if validations fail; only perform the assignment and
return the matrix after all checks pass.
| function where(arr, searchDetails) { | ||
| let newArr = [] | ||
| const searchKey = Object.keys(searchDetails) | ||
|
|
||
| for (const obj of arr) { | ||
| let match = true | ||
|
|
||
| for (const i in searchKey) { | ||
| if (obj[searchKey[i]] != searchDetails[searchKey[i]]) { | ||
| match = false | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (match) { | ||
| newArr.push(obj) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| console.log(newArr) | ||
| return newArr | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove console.log and simplify matching; prefer strict equality.
Unconditional logging is noisy. The loop can be simplified and short-circuited; use === to avoid coercion.
function where(arr, searchDetails) {
- let newArr = []
- const searchKey = Object.keys(searchDetails)
-
- for (const obj of arr) {
- let match = true
-
- for (const i in searchKey) {
- if (obj[searchKey[i]] != searchDetails[searchKey[i]]) {
- match = false
- }
- }
-
- if (match) {
- newArr.push(obj)
- }
- }
- console.log(newArr)
- return newArr
+ const keys = Object.keys(searchDetails)
+ return arr.filter((obj) => keys.every((k) => obj && obj[k] === searchDetails[k]))
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function where(arr, searchDetails) { | |
| let newArr = [] | |
| const searchKey = Object.keys(searchDetails) | |
| for (const obj of arr) { | |
| let match = true | |
| for (const i in searchKey) { | |
| if (obj[searchKey[i]] != searchDetails[searchKey[i]]) { | |
| match = false | |
| } | |
| } | |
| if (match) { | |
| newArr.push(obj) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| console.log(newArr) | |
| return newArr | |
| } | |
| function where(arr, searchDetails) { | |
| const keys = Object.keys(searchDetails) | |
| return arr.filter((obj) => keys.every((k) => obj && obj[k] === searchDetails[k])) | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 3-JSKata/3-data-structures/where.js around lines 1-20, remove the console.log
and simplify/short-circuit the matching logic while using strict equality:
compute the searchKeys with Object.keys(searchDetails), iterate over them with a
for...of (or use Array.prototype.every) and break/short-circuit as soon as a
non-match is found, comparing values with === instead of !=; push matching
objects to newArr (or return arr.filter(...) directly) and return the result
without any console output.
| function filter(arr, func) { | ||
| const elements = [] | ||
| for (i in arr) { | ||
| if (func(arr[i])) { | ||
| elements.push(arr[i]) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return elements | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid for...in on arrays and implicit globals
for...in iterates keys (and inherited) and i is undeclared; use for...of.
function filter(arr, func) {
const elements = []
- for (i in arr) {
- if (func(arr[i])) {
- elements.push(arr[i])
- }
- }
+ for (const el of arr) {
+ if (func(el)) elements.push(el)
+ }
return elements
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function filter(arr, func) { | |
| const elements = [] | |
| for (i in arr) { | |
| if (func(arr[i])) { | |
| elements.push(arr[i]) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return elements | |
| } | |
| function filter(arr, func) { | |
| const elements = [] | |
| for (const el of arr) { | |
| if (func(el)) elements.push(el) | |
| } | |
| return elements | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 3-JSKata/4-types/functions.js lines 9-17, the function uses for...in and an
undeclared i which iterates inherited keys and creates an implicit global;
replace it with a proper array iteration (e.g., for (const item of arr) { if
(func(item)) elements.push(item); }) or use arr.forEach/arr.filter, and ensure
any loop variable is declared with let/const to avoid globals.
| function find(arr, func) { | ||
| for (i in arr) { | ||
| if (func(arr[i])) { | ||
| return arr[i] | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same issue in find
Switch to for...of to avoid global i and prototype keys.
function find(arr, func) {
- for (i in arr) {
- if (func(arr[i])) {
- return arr[i]
- }
- }
+ for (const el of arr) {
+ if (func(el)) return el
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function find(arr, func) { | |
| for (i in arr) { | |
| if (func(arr[i])) { | |
| return arr[i] | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| function find(arr, func) { | |
| for (const el of arr) { | |
| if (func(el)) return el | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 3-JSKata/4-types/functions.js around lines 19 to 25, the current
implementation uses "for (i in arr)" which leaks a global i and iterates
prototype keys; replace it with a for...of loop such as "for (const item of
arr)" and call func(item), returning item when true; also ensure the function
returns undefined (or null) explicitly if no element matches.
| function map(arr, func) { | ||
| const elements = [] | ||
| for (i in arr) { | ||
| elements.push(func(arr[i])) | ||
| } | ||
| return elements | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same issue in map
Use for...of and local variable.
function map(arr, func) {
const elements = []
- for (i in arr) {
- elements.push(func(arr[i]))
- }
+ for (const el of arr) {
+ elements.push(func(el))
+ }
return elements
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function map(arr, func) { | |
| const elements = [] | |
| for (i in arr) { | |
| elements.push(func(arr[i])) | |
| } | |
| return elements | |
| } | |
| function map(arr, func) { | |
| const elements = [] | |
| for (const el of arr) { | |
| elements.push(func(el)) | |
| } | |
| return elements | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 3-JSKata/4-types/functions.js around lines 27-33, the map implementation uses
a for-in loop and an undeclared loop variable which can iterate over inherited
properties and leak a global; change it to use a for...of loop with a local loop
variable (e.g., for (const item of arr)) and call func(item) when pushing into
the elements array so iteration is safe and variables are properly scoped.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
4-React/src/components/Subtitle/Subtitle.jsx (1)
1-7: Simple and functional implementation.The component correctly renders the subtitle text. Consider destructuring props for cleaner code:
-export function Subtitle(props) { +export function Subtitle({ text }) { return ( <h2> - <span className="subtitle">{props.text}</span> + <span className="subtitle">{text}</span> </h2> ) }4-React/src/components/DogList/DogList.jsx (1)
3-11: Consider prop destructuring for cleaner code.The component logic is correct. For improved readability, consider destructuring the
dogsprop:-export function DogList(props) { +export function DogList({ dogs }) { return ( <> - {props.dogs.map((dog, index) => ( + {dogs.map((dog, index) => ( <Dog key={dog.name} name={dog.name} breed={dog.breed} superpower={dog.superpower} /> ))} </> ) }4-React/src/components/Dog/Dog.jsx (1)
1-19: Well-structured component with correct image path logic.The breed-to-image-path transformation is implemented correctly, and the component layout is clean and semantic.
Consider destructuring props for improved readability:
-export function Dog(props) { - const imageBreed = props.breed.charAt(0).toLowerCase() + props.breed.slice(1) +export function Dog({ name, breed, superpower }) { + const imageBreed = breed.charAt(0).toLowerCase() + breed.slice(1) return ( <div className="dog-wrapper"> <div className="dog"> <img src={`/images/${imageBreed}.png`} - alt={props.breed} + alt={breed} className="dog-image" /> <div className="dog-name-plate"> - <span className="dog-name">{props.name}</span> - <span className="dog-breed">{props.breed}</span> + <span className="dog-name">{name}</span> + <span className="dog-breed">{breed}</span> </div> - <span className="dog-superpower">{props.superpower}</span> + <span className="dog-superpower">{superpower}</span> </div> </div> ) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
4-React/src/components/Dog/Dog.jsx(1 hunks)4-React/src/components/Dog/index.js(1 hunks)4-React/src/components/DogList/DogList.jsx(1 hunks)4-React/src/components/DogList/index.js(1 hunks)4-React/src/components/Main/Main.jsx(1 hunks)4-React/src/components/Subtitle/Subtitle.jsx(1 hunks)4-React/src/components/Subtitle/index.js(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- 4-React/src/components/Subtitle/index.js
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
4-React/src/components/DogList/DogList.jsx (1)
4-React/src/components/Dog/Dog.jsx (1)
Dog(1-19)
4-React/src/components/Main/Main.jsx (3)
4-React/src/components/Logo/Logo.jsx (1)
Logo(1-3)4-React/src/components/Subtitle/Subtitle.jsx (1)
Subtitle(1-7)4-React/src/components/DogList/DogList.jsx (1)
DogList(3-11)
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
4-React/src/components/DogList/DogList.jsx
[error] 7-7: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
4-React/src/components/Dog/index.js (1)
1-1: LGTM!Clean barrel export following React conventions.
4-React/src/components/Main/Main.jsx (1)
1-31: LGTM!The component composition is well-structured with clear separation of concerns. The dogs data array and component rendering logic are implemented correctly.
4-React/src/components/DogList/index.js (1)
1-1: LGTM!Clean barrel export following React conventions.
| {props.dogs.map((dog) => ( | ||
| <Dog name={dog.name} breed={dog.breed} superpower={dog.superpower} /> | ||
| ))} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing key prop in mapped Dog components.
React requires a unique key prop for each element in a list to efficiently track changes and prevent rendering issues. Without keys, React may re-render items incorrectly when the list changes.
Apply this diff to add the key prop:
- {props.dogs.map((dog) => (
- <Dog name={dog.name} breed={dog.breed} superpower={dog.superpower} />
+ {props.dogs.map((dog, index) => (
+ <Dog key={dog.name} name={dog.name} breed={dog.breed} superpower={dog.superpower} />
))}Note: Using dog.name as the key assumes each dog has a unique name. If names might not be unique, consider using a unique ID field or index as a fallback (though index is less optimal for dynamic lists).
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {props.dogs.map((dog) => ( | |
| <Dog name={dog.name} breed={dog.breed} superpower={dog.superpower} /> | |
| ))} | |
| {props.dogs.map((dog, index) => ( | |
| <Dog key={dog.name} name={dog.name} breed={dog.breed} superpower={dog.superpower} /> | |
| ))} |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
[error] 7-7: Missing key property for this element in iterable.
The order of the items may change, and having a key can help React identify which item was moved.
Check the React documentation.
(lint/correctness/useJsxKeyInIterable)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 4-React/src/components/DogList/DogList.jsx around lines 6 to 8, the mapped
<Dog> elements are missing a unique key prop; add a key prop to the rendered Dog
component (e.g., key={dog.name}) and if dog.name may not be unique use a unique
id field like dog.id or, as a last resort, key={index} by including the map
index in the callback signature; ensure the key is placed on the top-level
element returned by the map.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: Did you mean “JavaScript” (= programming language)?
Context: ...](/2-Basics/README.md) (7hrs) - [x] 3. Java Script Kata's (8hrs) - [...
(JAVA_SCRIPT)
| - [ ] 3. [Java Script Kata's](/3-JSKata/README.md) (8hrs) | ||
| - [x] 1. [Initial Set Up](/1-SetUp/README.md) (1.5hrs) | ||
| - [x] 2. [Basics](/2-Basics/README.md) (7hrs) | ||
| - [x] 3. [Java Script Kata's](/3-JSKata/README.md) (8hrs) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Standardize "JavaScript" spelling.
The standard spelling is "JavaScript" (one word, capital J), not "Java Script".
Apply this diff to correct the spelling:
- [x] 3. [Java Script Kata's](/3-JSKata/README.md) (8hrs)
+ [x] 3. [JavaScript Kata's](/3-JSKata/README.md) (8hrs)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - [x] 3. [Java Script Kata's](/3-JSKata/README.md) (8hrs) | |
| - [x] 3. [JavaScript Kata's](/3-JSKata/README.md) (8hrs) |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: Did you mean “JavaScript” (= programming language)?
Context: ...](/2-Basics/README.md) (7hrs) - [x] 3. Java Script Kata's (8hrs) - [...
(JAVA_SCRIPT)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around line 23, replace the incorrect "Java Script" with the
standardized single-word spelling "JavaScript" so the line reads "[x] 3.
[JavaScript Kata's](/3-JSKata/README.md) (8hrs)"; apply that exact spelling
change in the file.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores