Skip to content

Conversation

@omarisgreat
Copy link
Contributor

Includes correction to systems used in activity and plandefinition examples

Includes correction to systems used in activity and plandefinition examples
Min cardinality of 0 indicates data element is not required but can be added. Max = 0 indicates data element cannot be added
Copy link
Collaborator

@KazeemHamzat KazeemHamzat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the difference of the two new NamingSystems added and those listed below. They seems to have similar canonical URL.

  1. England-GenomicTestDirectory
  2. EnglandDigitalGenomicTestServices

@omarisgreat
Copy link
Contributor Author

What is the difference of the two new NamingSystems added and those listed below. They seems to have similar canonical URL.

  1. England-GenomicTestDirectory
  2. EnglandDigitalGenomicTestServices

Hi Kazeem, these are namingschemes for Identifiers rather than CodeSystems (see kind) this would allow the url to be used in ActivityDefinition and PlanDefinition identifier elements. I don't believe namingschemes with kind=codesystem would allow this. The codesystem namingschemes are still required to allow the codes in ServiceRequest.code

Copy link
Collaborator

@KazeemHamzat KazeemHamzat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay

@omarisgreat omarisgreat merged commit b529163 into main Dec 15, 2025
1 check passed
@omarisgreat omarisgreat deleted the Feature/IOPS-3549-DGTS-CapabilityStatement branch December 15, 2025 15:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants