Skip to content

Conversation

@TheBB
Copy link
Contributor

@TheBB TheBB commented Jan 24, 2017

Supersedes #4

CC @akva2 @kmokstad

@akva2
Copy link
Member

akva2 commented Jan 24, 2017

git rebase -i --autosquash origin/master please

@akva2
Copy link
Member

akva2 commented Jan 24, 2017

seems to depend on TheBB/hydraulic_fracture in IFEM-PoroElasticity

Added: Linkage to poro-elasticity module.
Changed: Updated README.md to reflect the dependency on PoroElasticity.
and have a (pointer to a) FractureElasticity object as member.
Changed: Let the parent class of SIMDynElasticity be a template argument.
Added: Constructor for mixed problems.
…asticity

without the phase-field coupling, but still with the strain energy split
… point,

and the broken permeability tensor based on phase field and deformation state
Fixed: Removed extraction of element velocity and accelereation
in PoroFracture::initElement, it is done by the parent class method.
and new command-line options -explcrack to activate it
@TheBB TheBB force-pushed the poro-fracture-actual branch from 3e875e2 to 930482c Compare January 24, 2017 13:31
@TheBB
Copy link
Contributor Author

TheBB commented Jan 24, 2017

Yeah, opened a PR for that OPM/IFEM-PoroElasticity#11

@TheBB TheBB force-pushed the poro-fracture-actual branch from 930482c to 84aebb7 Compare January 24, 2017 13:38
@akva2
Copy link
Member

akva2 commented Jan 24, 2017

jenkins build this please

@TheBB
Copy link
Contributor Author

TheBB commented Jan 24, 2017

Note, regarding mixed, the only thing which I know doesn't work is the displacement extraction in PoroFractureElasticityVoigt.

@akva2
Copy link
Member

akva2 commented Jan 26, 2017

@kmokstad er dette kanskje et bra tidspunkt for å merge den her (konflikt-minimering and all that jazz).

@kmokstad
Copy link
Contributor

Har oppdatert det opprinnelige branchen i #4 med den siste committen her, bare noe omskrevet.
Den overloada getElementSolution metoden bruker nå parent-klasse metoden først, for deretter å filtrere resultat-vektoren. Dette bør fungere når man setter npv-memberen til nsd+1 i FractureElasticity constructoren som brukes i dette tilfellet. Men sjekk at dette gir det samme som for løsningen her først.

Tok ikke med xinp-endringen enda, da denne bør tilpasses til en reg-test når ting har landa.
Når det det har gjort kan dette pulles til master.

@kmokstad
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this one, since everything here is included in #4 which now has been rebased.

@kmokstad kmokstad closed this Jan 18, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants