Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

Refactored the documentation in docs/services/ to replace raw AST dumps with human-readable, descriptive Markdown.

  • Updated core.md to reflect the current Core struct and methods.
  • Updated runtime.md to describe the Runtime wrapper and ServiceRuntime.
  • Updated config.md to document the Config interface.
  • Rewrote crypt.md, display.md, help.md, i18n.md, workspace.md to properly describe the service interfaces and types, derived from the previous AST dumps.
  • Corrected import paths and initialization code in docs/index.md to match the current project structure.

Note: The codebase seems to be in a state where some services (Display, etc.) referenced in tests are missing from the core package, causing task test to fail compilation. The documentation update reflects the apparent intent of these services based on the previous docs and typical usage patterns, while accurately describing the existing core implementation.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 11758873554422912499 started by @Snider

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Snider Snider marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2025 00:08
@Snider Snider merged commit c8c9d78 into dev Nov 25, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@Snider Snider deleted the docs-descriptive-markdown branch November 25, 2025 00:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants