Add Good, Bad, and Ugly tests #35
Conversation
This commit refactors the test suites for the `crypt` and `enchantrix` packages to follow the "Good, Bad, Ugly" testing methodology. - `_Good` tests cover the ideal "happy path" scenarios. - `_Bad` tests cover expected failure scenarios with well-formed but invalid inputs. - `_Ugly` tests cover malicious or malformed inputs designed to cause crashes or panics. This change improves test coverage and ensures that the codebase is more robust and resilient to unexpected inputs.
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. |
|
Important Review skippedBot user detected. To trigger a single review, invoke the You can disable this status message by setting the Comment |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
This commit refactors the test suites for the
cryptandenchantrixpackages to follow the "Good, Bad, Ugly" testing methodology._Goodtests cover the ideal "happy path" scenarios,_Badtests cover expected failure scenarios with well-formed but invalid inputs, and_Uglytests cover malicious or malformed inputs designed to cause crashes or panics. This change improves test coverage and ensures that the codebase is more robust and resilient to unexpected inputs.PR created automatically by Jules for task 4116561919001194794 started by @Snider