Improve merge docs

[tudddorrr]

No description provided.

[claude]

Documentation Review: Improve merge docs

Thank you for improving the merge documentation! The additions provide much-needed context and a practical example. Here's my feedback:

Spelling and Grammar

Issue 1: Subject-verb agreement (both files)

• Line 89 (Godot) / Line 124 (Unity): "The merge process takes all the props... and merge them"
• Fix: Should be "merges" to maintain parallel structure with "takes"
• Suggested text: "The merge process takes all the props, aliases, and associated data (events, leaderboard entries, saves, etc.) from Player 2 and merges them into Player 1."

Clarity and Conciseness

Issue 2: Redundant explanation

• Line 112 (Godot) / Line 148 (Unity): The final sentence restates information already clear from the code example
• Current: "This means that Talo.current_alias is now the "anonymous" alias."
• Suggestion: Consider removing this sentence or making it more concise. The code comments and previous sentence already make this clear.

Issue 3: Passive voice in explanation

• Line 112 (Godot) / Line 148 (Unity): "Since the postMergeIdentityService option is set, Talo.Players.Identify() is invoked..."
• Suggestion: Use active voice for clarity: "Setting the postMergeIdentityService option causes the SDK to invoke Talo.Players.Identify() with the "anonymous" alias."

Consistency

Issue 4: Code comment style

• Comments use // in C# Unity examples (correct)
• Comments use # in GDScript Godot examples (correct)
• Status: This is already done correctly! Good job maintaining language-specific conventions.

Examples

Strength: The added example is excellent! It clearly demonstrates:

• Creating two separate player identities
• The state before merging
• How to use the merge options
• The state after merging

Suggestion: Consider adding a simpler example before the post_merge_identity_service example showing the basic merge without options. This would show users the simplest case first, then the advanced case.

Summary

Overall, this is a strong improvement to the documentation! The additions make the merging concept much clearer with a real-world use case.

Critical Action Item:

• Fix "merge" → "merges" in line 89 (Godot) and line 124 (Unity) for proper subject-verb agreement

Optional Improvements:

• Consider the clarity/conciseness suggestions above
• Consider adding a basic merge example without options

[claude]

Documentation Review: Improve merge docs

Thank you for improving the merge documentation! Overall, this is a helpful enhancement that adds much-needed context and examples. Here's my feedback:

Spelling and Grammar ✅

No spelling errors found. The grammar is correct throughout.

Clarity and Conciseness 👍

Strengths:

• The new opening sentence effectively explains the use case: "Sometimes you might start tracking a player's actions before you know their true identity."
• The concrete example (anonymous identifier → username) makes the scenario relatable and easy to understand
• The explanation of which player's data takes precedence is now clearer with the bold formatting on Player 1 and Player 2
• The caution callout about overlapping alias services is important and well-placed

Suggestions for improvement:

1. Redundancy in opening: The phrase "Since both of these players need to be identified, two players will be created" could be more concise. Consider: "Since both require identification, two separate players will be created."

2. Terminology consistency: The text uses both "identity service" and "alias service" (in the caution block). While they appear to refer to the same concept, using consistent terminology throughout would improve clarity. Consider standardizing on one term.

Examples 📝

Strengths:

• The code examples are comprehensive and show the complete flow
• Including both the before and after states (print statements showing "username" then "anonymous") is excellent
• The explanatory paragraph after the code reinforces the key concepts

Suggestions for improvement:

1. Godot example (docs/godot/identifying.md:98-112):

   • Minor issue: The variable naming uses snake_case (player1_id, player2_id) which is good for GDScript
   • Consider adding a comment in the code about why you might want to merge in this direction (Player 1 = anonymous, Player 2 = username) vs. the reverse

2. Unity example (docs/unity/identifying.md:133-148):

   • Minor: new Guid().ToString() creates a new empty GUID (all zeros). Consider Guid.NewGuid().ToString() for an actual unique identifier, which would be more realistic for an anonymous identifier

Consistency 🔄

Between Godot and Unity docs:

• The changes are well-synchronized between both documentation files
• Both follow the same structure and messaging
• The caution callout is identical in both (good!)

Minor inconsistency:

• The Unity version uses postMergeIdentityService (camelCase) while Godot uses post_merge_identity_service (snake_case). This appears to be intentional based on each language's conventions, so this is actually correct! ✅

Overall Assessment

This is a solid improvement to the documentation. The new content significantly enhances understanding of when and why to use player merging. The examples are helpful and practical.

Priority fixes:

1. Unity example line 133: Change new Guid() to Guid.NewGuid() for a realistic unique identifier

Optional improvements:

1. Reduce redundancy in the opening paragraph
2. Standardize terminology between "identity service" and "alias service"
3. Consider adding a brief comment in the code examples about merge direction rationale

Great work on this documentation update!

[claude]

Documentation Review: PR #39 - Improve merge docs

Thank you for improving the merge documentation! The additional context and examples are very helpful. Here's my feedback:

Spelling and Grammar

No spelling or grammar errors found. The text is well-written and clear.

Clarity, Conciseness, and Consistency

Strengths:

• The new introductory paragraph provides excellent context with a concrete use case
• The caution callout about overlapping alias services is clear and helpful
• The example code effectively demonstrates the merge flow

Areas for improvement:

1. Clarify the merge direction:

   • The bold formatting on "Player 2" and "Player 1" helps, but consider making the direction even clearer:
   • Suggested: "The merge process takes all the props, aliases, and associated data (events, leaderboard entries, saves, etc.) from Player 2 and merges them into Player 1 (the target player). This means that duplicate props in Player 1 will be replaced by the ones from Player 2."

2. Code example variable naming (GDScript):

   • The variable name mergeOpts uses camelCase, but typical GDScript convention is snake_case
   • Suggested: var merge_opts := Talo.players.MergeOptions.new()
   • The C# example correctly uses camelCase which is appropriate

3. Explanation clarity:

   • The final explanation paragraph could be slightly more concise
   • Suggested: "In the example above, after creating two players with Talo.players.identify(), they are merged. Before merging, the current alias was "username" (the most recently identified player). Setting post_merge_identity_service to "anonymous" automatically re-identifies the merged player with that alias."

Examples

Strengths:

• The example is comprehensive and demonstrates a realistic use case
• Shows both the setup and the merge operation
• Includes print/debug statements to show the before/after state

Suggestions:

1. Add error handling: Following the pattern from other docs (like player-authentication.md), consider showing how to handle potential errors when players have overlapping aliases

2. Consider a simpler example first: Add a basic example before the complex post_merge_identity_service one:

   # Basic merge example
   var merged_player := await Talo.players.merge(player1_id, player2_id)
   # Player 2 data is now part of Player 1

3. Clarify Player 2 fate: It might be helpful to mention what happens to Player 2 after the merge (is it deleted? can it still be accessed?)

Overall Assessment

This is a solid improvement to the documentation! The new content significantly clarifies when and why you'd want to merge players. The main actionable suggestions are:

• Fix the GDScript naming convention (snake_case for merge_opts)
• Consider adding a simpler example before the complex one
• Minor rewording for clarity

Great work on making this feature more understandable!