Skip to content

Conversation

@luisg123v
Copy link
Contributor

When granting access to SSH keys by adding the same public key to the authorized_keys file, the existing file was being overwritten, because the mode "w" was being used instead of "a". This is the equivalent of using > instead of >> in shell.

To solve this, the "a" mode is now used.

When granting access to SSH keys by adding the same public key to
the `authorized_keys` file, the existing file was being overwritten,
because the mode "w" was being used instead of "a". This is the
equivalent of using `>` instead of `>>` in shell.

To solve this, the "a" mode is now used.
@luisg123v
Copy link
Contributor Author

@moylop260,

What do you think about this change?

Regards,

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 80.65%. Comparing base (001f7f0) to head (26165a5).
⚠️ Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/travis2docker/travis2docker.py 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #225      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.61%   80.65%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         614      615       +1     
  Branches      113       91      -22     
==========================================
+ Hits          495      496       +1     
  Misses         86       86              
  Partials       33       33              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@moylop260
Copy link
Collaborator

👍

@moylop260 moylop260 merged commit e3d84d8 into Vauxoo:main Aug 20, 2025
23 checks passed
@moylop260 moylop260 deleted the keep-keys-luisg branch August 20, 2025 22:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants