Skip to content

Conversation

@gzliudan
Copy link
Collaborator

@gzliudan gzliudan commented Jan 5, 2026

Proposed changes

Ref: ethereum#27523

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to XDC network?
Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation Update (if none of the other choices apply)
  • Regular KTLO or any of the maintaince work. e.g code style
  • CICD Improvement

Impacted Components

Which part of the codebase this PR will touch base on,

Put an in the boxes that apply

  • Consensus
  • Account
  • Network
  • Geth
  • Smart Contract
  • External components
  • Not sure (Please specify below)

Checklist

Put an in the boxes once you have confirmed below actions (or provide reasons on not doing so) that

  • This PR has sufficient test coverage (unit/integration test) OR I have provided reason in the PR description for not having test coverage
  • Provide an end-to-end test plan in the PR description on how to manually test it on the devnet/testnet.
  • Tested the backwards compatibility.
  • Tested with XDC nodes running this version co-exist with those running the previous version.
  • Relevant documentation has been updated as part of this PR
  • N/A

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 5, 2026 10:09
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 5, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 5, 2026 10:41
@gzliudan gzliudan force-pushed the remove-errors-join branch from 051aee9 to e3ec789 Compare January 5, 2026 10:41
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR removes the use of Go's errors.Join function from the transaction pool's Close method, replacing it with a custom error aggregation approach using fmt.Errorf. The change was made to address issue ethereum#27523, likely for compatibility with older Go versions that don't support errors.Join (introduced in Go 1.20).

Key changes:

  • Replaced errors import with fmt import
  • Modified error collection to only append non-nil errors instead of all errors
  • Replaced errors.Join(errs...) with a manual check and custom error formatting

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

}
return errors.Join(errs...)
if len(errs) > 0 {
return fmt.Errorf("subpool close errors: %v", errs)
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 5, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error message "subpool close errors" is misleading because the errs slice can also contain an error from the quit channel (line 92-94), which is not a subpool close error. Consider using a more accurate message like "transaction pool close errors" or separately handling and reporting errors from different sources for better diagnostics.

Suggested change
return fmt.Errorf("subpool close errors: %v", errs)
return fmt.Errorf("transaction pool close errors: %v", errs)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment on lines +101 to +102
if len(errs) > 0 {
return fmt.Errorf("subpool close errors: %v", errs)
Copy link

Copilot AI Jan 5, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The formatting of multiple errors using fmt.Errorf with %v will produce a slice representation like "[error1 error2]" which is not as user-friendly as the errors.Join function which formats errors on separate lines. Consider using a loop with strings.Builder to format each error on its own line, or use a semicolon-separated format for better readability.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants