Compare normalized allocation rate instead of non-normalized in compare command #70
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of changes:
ion-java-benchmark-cli compare ...will report regressions on average memory allocation rate/second (gc.alloc.rate), which is not a signal worth relying on since it is sensitive to execution speed. This changes the compare command to compare normalized allocation rate instead and adds a quick test.This should reduce some false positives in the ion-java performance regression GitHub workflow, since I've noticed many of them are related to gc alloc rate.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.