Rename AsymmetricCryptoKey to PrivateKey

[quexten]

🎟️ Tracking

📔 Objective

Renames the non-standard "AsymmetricCryptoKey" to a more easily understandable "PrivateKey", "AsymmetricCryptoPublicKey" to "PublicKey". There is no functional changes.

This aligns with signature keys, and we should follow up with the same for symmetric keys:

- Secret Key Encryption:
  - SymmetricKey
- Public Key Encryption
  - PrivateKey
  - PublicKey
- Digital Signatures
  - SigningKey
  - VerifyingKey

🚨 Breaking Changes

⏰ Reminders before review

• Contributor guidelines followed
• All formatters and local linters executed and passed
• Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
• Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
• Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
• CI builds passed
• Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
• Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation
  team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

• 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
• 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
• ❓ (:question:) for questions
• 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed
  issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
• 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
• ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
• 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
• ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

[github-actions]

Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details – 16c41b58-09eb-4f9a-88b7-2b9a9cb03403

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

[github-actions]

🔍 SDK Breaking Change Detection Results

SDK Version: km/rename-asymmetric-to-private (f2fdae9)
Completed: 2025-12-18 17:48:28 UTC
Total Time: 246s

Client	Status	Details
typescript	✅ No breaking changes detected	TypeScript compilation passed with new SDK version - View Details

---

Breaking change detection completed. View SDK workflow

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 91.93548% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 78.52%. Comparing base (0a9599e) to head (f2fdae9).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
crates/bitwarden-crypto/src/store/context.rs	85.71%	7 Missing ⚠️
crates/bitwarden-core/src/auth/tde.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...bitwarden-crypto/src/keys/public_key_encryption.rs	88.88%	1 Missing ⚠️
crates/bitwarden-crypto/src/store/mod.rs	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #620      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.54%   78.52%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         283      283              
  Lines       29251    29218      -33     
==========================================
- Hits        22975    22944      -31     
+ Misses       6276     6274       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.