⚡️ Speed up function _should_check_db by 11%
#439
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 11% (0.11x) speedup for
_should_check_dbinlitellm/proxy/auth/auth_checks.py⏱️ Runtime :
1.33 milliseconds→1.20 milliseconds(best of21runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization achieves a 10% speedup by eliminating redundant operations and minimizing expensive function calls:
Key optimizations:
Single dictionary lookup: Uses
try/except KeyErrorinstead ofkey not in dictfollowed bydict[key], reducing dictionary access from potentially 3 lookups to just 1.Deferred
time.time()call: Only calls the expensivetime.time()function when actually needed for expiry checking (whenv0 is None), rather than calling it upfront for every invocation.Cached tuple access: Stores
last_db_access_time[key]in a variable to avoid repeated dictionary lookups and tuple indexing operations.Performance impact by test case:
time.time()callsHot path significance: This function is called in authentication flows for both
get_user_object()and_get_team_object_from_user_api_key_cache(), which are executed on every API request. The optimizations are particularly valuable since the profiler shows 59.8% of original runtime was spent on the upfronttime.time()call that's now conditional, and 24.4% on dictionary lookups that are now more efficient.The optimized version maintains identical behavior while being consistently faster across all usage patterns, making it especially beneficial for high-throughput authentication scenarios.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-_should_check_db-mhww2fpoand push.