Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions CONTRIBUTING.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -110,3 +110,17 @@ In general, reviewers are acting in the role of maintainers in the open-source m
1. Share non-blocking improvement feedback
1. Things like typos, spelling errors, capitalization, rephrasing (Depending on repo-specific styles some of these might be required)
1. Ask questions for reviewer's own understanding & learning

#### The reviewer checklist

A reviewer's job is to ensure that the answer to all these questions is 'yes'. Only then should a PR be approved.

- [ ] Does the PR have a problem statement that is clear and for an existing agreed upon quality bar? (subjective: typos, color strings, etc)
- [ ] Does this PR have an issue associated with it?
- [ ] Was the issue triaged?
- [ ] Does the PR fix only the issue or problem statement described in the simplest way? (subjective)
- [ ] Does the PR have sufficient test coverage? (subjective: does it need tests? do they exist? are they in the pr?)
- [ ] Have manual testing requirements been done? (e.g. hackmudclient needs manual testing on windows)
- [ ] Does any documentation need to be updated or created?
- [ ] Is a migration required for this change? (e.g. marks schema migration, account or user schema migration)
- [ ] Was all debugging output code removed from the change?
Loading