Skip to content

Conversation

@HenrikHL
Copy link
Contributor

@HenrikHL HenrikHL commented Nov 3, 2025

User description

SD-2567: Add feedbacks object to the TransportDocument
Update What's New


PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Add feedbacks array property to TransportDocument schema

  • Feedback types include unsupported properties, changed values, removed properties, general information

  • References new Feedback schema component


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  TD["TransportDocument"] -- "adds feedbacks array" --> FB["Feedback items"]
  FB -- "references" --> FS["Feedback schema"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Enhancement
EBL_v3.0.2.yaml
Add feedbacks array to TransportDocument                                 

ebl/v3/EBL_v3.0.2.yaml

  • Added feedbacks array property to TransportDocument schema
  • Includes descriptive documentation of feedback types
  • References Feedback schema component via $ref
+10/-0   
Configuration changes
styleguide.json
Styleguide configuration update                                                   

.stoplight/styleguide.json

  • Configuration file modified (insufficient details available)
+1/-1     

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

qodo-code-review bot commented Nov 3, 2025

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

(Compliance updated until commit f859590)

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status:
Audit logging unclear: The added feedbacks array defines schema structure but provides no indication whether
creation/update of feedback entries are audited with user, timestamp, action, and outcome.

Referred Code
feedbacks:
  type: array
  description: |
    Feedback that can be provided includes, but is not limited to:
    - unsupported properties
    - changed values
    - removed properties
    - general information
  items:
    $ref: '#/components/schemas/Feedback'
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status:
Edge cases unspecified: The schema adds a feedbacks array without constraints or guidance on empty/null handling
or validation of feedback items, leaving potential edge cases unspecified at the schema
level.

Referred Code
feedbacks:
  type: array
  description: |
    Feedback that can be provided includes, but is not limited to:
    - unsupported properties
    - changed values
    - removed properties
    - general information
  items:
    $ref: '#/components/schemas/Feedback'
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status:
Validation not defined: The new feedbacks array references Feedback items but does not specify array-level
constraints (e.g., maxItems, uniqueness) or item validation details, which may impact
input validation depending on the referenced schema.

Referred Code
feedbacks:
  type: array
  description: |
    Feedback that can be provided includes, but is not limited to:
    - unsupported properties
    - changed values
    - removed properties
    - general information
  items:
    $ref: '#/components/schemas/Feedback'
Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

Previous compliance checks

Compliance check up to commit 70e7d68
Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🟡
🎫 #SD-2567
🟢 Add a new feedbacks array property to the TransportDocument schema.
Ensure feedbacks reference a Feedback schema component for its items.
Describe supported feedback types: unsupported properties, changed values, removed
properties, and general information.
Confirm that the referenced Feedback schema exists in the components section and matches
intended structure (cannot be fully verified from partial diff).
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status:
No auditing context: The added schema fields define data structure only and do not implement or demonstrate
logging of critical actions, making audit compliance unverifiable from this diff alone.

Referred Code
feedbacks:
  type: array
  description: |
    Feedback that can be provided includes, but is not limited to:
    - unsupported properties
    - changed values
    - removed properties
    - general information
  items:
    $ref: '#/components/schemas/Feedback'
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status:
No error handling: The change adds schema properties without executable logic, so error handling and edge
case management cannot be assessed from this diff.

Referred Code
feedbacks:
  type: array
  description: |
    Feedback that can be provided includes, but is not limited to:
    - unsupported properties
    - changed values
    - removed properties
    - general information
  items:
    $ref: '#/components/schemas/Feedback'
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status:
Validation unspecified: The new 'feedbacks' array references a 'Feedback' schema but provides
no constraints or validation details here, so security and input validation adequacy
cannot be confirmed from this diff.

Referred Code
feedbacks:
  type: array
  description: |
    Feedback that can be provided includes, but is not limited to:
    - unsupported properties
    - changed values
    - removed properties
    - general information
  items:
    $ref: '#/components/schemas/Feedback'

@qodo-code-review
Copy link

qodo-code-review bot commented Nov 3, 2025

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

@HenrikHL HenrikHL merged commit 466b1ed into master Nov 4, 2025
1 check passed
@HenrikHL HenrikHL deleted the SD-2567_Add-feedbacks branch November 4, 2025 14:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants