Skip to content

Conversation

@dentiny
Copy link
Owner

@dentiny dentiny commented Aug 17, 2025

Summary

Briefly explain what this PR does.

Related Issues

Closes # or links to related issues.

Changes

Checklist

  • Code builds correctly
  • Tests have been added or updated
  • Documentation updated if necessary
  • I have reviewed my own changes

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @dentiny, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new comprehensive standalone integration test for the moonlink_service. The test suite simulates a full end-to-end workflow, including service readiness checks, table creation and data ingestion via the REST API, and data scanning via the RPC interface. It leverages Arrow and Parquet for data handling and verification, ensuring the service's core functionalities work as expected in an integrated environment.

Highlights

  • New Standalone Integration Test: A new test module moonlink_standalone_test has been added to provide end-to-end validation of the moonlink_service.
  • Comprehensive Workflow Testing: The test covers critical aspects such as service readiness, creating tables and ingesting data through the REST API, and scanning data using the RPC interface.
  • Data Verification with Arrow/Parquet: The test suite utilizes Arrow and Parquet formats to read and verify the integrity of scanned data, ensuring correct data flow and serialization.
  • New Test Utility for Read State: A new public utility function, decode_serialized_read_state_for_testing, has been exposed to facilitate the deserialization of read state data within tests.
  • Updated Development Dependencies: Several new development dependencies (e.g., reqwest, arrow, parquet, tempfile) have been added to support the new integration test suite.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Warning

Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting /gemini review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants