-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
feat: use ValueError instead of TypeError for failed Operator.operation
#129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | ||
| **Added:** | ||
|
|
||
| * <news item> | ||
|
|
||
| **Changed:** | ||
|
|
||
| * Use ``ValueError`` instead of ``TypeError`` for failed ``Operator.operation``. | ||
|
|
||
| **Deprecated:** | ||
|
|
||
| * <news item> | ||
|
|
||
| **Removed:** | ||
|
|
||
| * <news item> | ||
|
|
||
| **Fixed:** | ||
|
|
||
| * <news item> | ||
|
|
||
| **Security:** | ||
|
|
||
| * <news item> |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -123,7 +123,13 @@ def getValue(self): | |
| """Get or evaluate the value of the operator.""" | ||
| if self._value is None: | ||
| vals = [arg.value for arg in self.args] | ||
| self._value = self.operation(*vals) | ||
| try: | ||
| self._value = self.operation(*vals) | ||
| except Exception as e: | ||
| raise ValueError( | ||
| "Error evaluating operator '%s' with arguments %s : %s" | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. could we have this as an f-string for greater readability? |
||
| % (self, vals, e) | ||
| ) | ||
| return self._value | ||
|
|
||
| value = property(lambda self: self.getValue()) | ||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should be
TypeErrormaybe? Turning any exception into a valueError may lead to confusion?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. After a second thought, I think maybe we should not modify it at all.
The test-case-bad uses
np.addbut only gives it one argument. We want to useValueErrorinstead ofTypeErrorin this bad case, because the input type is correct. But we can't customize all possible Errors that a user might encounter in their practice. I think the best approach is to leave the original error message and let the user see where they are wrong directly.So, I think it is better to raise whatever the external function raises. In this case, we can close #72 as not planned.