Skip to content

Conversation

@akurtakov
Copy link
Member

JUnit doesn't require such param be passed to the JVM. Work towards #2412

JUnit doesn't require such param be passed to the JVM.
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Test Results

 1 977 files  ±0   1 977 suites  ±0   1h 29m 2s ⏱️ - 1m 50s
 4 743 tests ±0   4 719 ✅ ±0   24 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
14 229 runs  ±0  14 047 ✅ ±0  182 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit c663279. ± Comparison against base commit 53226b1.

@akurtakov
Copy link
Member Author

I'll merge this one - nothing changes with this change for surefire (due to https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/test-mojo.html#enableAssertions ) . It will make obvious the cases that have to handled better in terminal tests ( probably reducing failing tests).

Additionally, it can be considered to run I-build tests with -ea but it would be best after terminal is fixed in order to not hide these problems.

@akurtakov akurtakov merged commit 0efa2ef into eclipse-platform:master Jan 7, 2026
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant