Skip to content

Conversation

@pahmann
Copy link
Member

@pahmann pahmann commented Dec 22, 2025

Resolves: #405

- Enhance verification plan template with detailed design, architectural design, and requirements coverage sections as well as Independence argument.
- Content is taken from the most recent verification plan within S-CORE main repo.

Resolves: #405
Signed-off-by: Philipp Ahmann <philipp.ahmann@de.bosch.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

- Static analysis and Linting
- :need:`wp__sw_implementation_inspection` for safety-critical implementation
Coverage of architectural design
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would not agree here with definition of coverage, same for detailed design, e.g. coverage must be measurable, e.g. coupling and cohesion metrics evaluated, complexity and dependency analysis performed?, all funcitonals requirements mapped to architectural components,
FMEA is a verification method, risk assessment, for me it looks like a summary of verification methods

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Is the content from PMP and Process area checked and properly aligned?

3 participants