Skip to content

Conversation

@Nico385412
Copy link

@Nico385412 Nico385412 commented Dec 5, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved formatting in error-handling documentation for better clarity and readability.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Walkthrough

A minor formatting adjustment to the error-handling documentation file, where bullet points describing status behavior are reformatted to emphasize code syntax for the status term while preserving the original meaning.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation formatting
docs/patterns/error-handling.md
Reformatted bullet points to improve code formatting emphasis (backticks around status); no functional or meaning changes to the documentation content.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single file affected with purely cosmetic/formatting adjustments
  • No logic, functionality, or documentation content changes to evaluate

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix typo in error-handling documentation #605: Both PRs modify docs/patterns/error-handling.md — this PR adjusts formatting while the other fixes a typo (toResponse), making them closely related edits to the same documentation file.

Poem

🐰 A dash of backticks here and there,
Makes the docs beyond compare!
Code formatting stands so bright,
Our error-handling guide shines right!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The PR title mentions fixing a typo, but the actual change is a minor formatting adjustment to bullet points, not a typo fix. Update the title to accurately reflect the change, such as 'docs(error-handling): improve code formatting in bullet points' or similar.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e5da8b and c6af256.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/patterns/error-handling.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/patterns/error-handling.md (1)

289-290: Documentation formatting enhancement — LGTM!

The changes properly format status, throw, return, and NOT using inline code and bold emphasis, making the technical distinctions between thrown vs returned status values more immediately apparent to readers. The markdown syntax is valid and the formatting is consistent with standard documentation practices.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant