Skip to content

Conversation

@yshyn-iohk
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Summarize the changes you're submitting in a few sentences, including Jira ticket ATL-xxxx if applicable.
Link to any discussion, related issues and bug reports to give the context to help the reviewer understand the PR.

Alternatives Considered (optional)

Link to existing ADR (Architecture Decision Record), if any. If relevant, describe other approaches explored and the selected approach. Documenting why the methods were not selected will create a knowledge base for future reference, helping prevent others from revisiting less optimal ideas.

Checklist

  • My PR follows the contribution guidelines of this project
  • My PR is free of third-party dependencies that don't comply with the Allowlist
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have checked the PR title to follow the conventional commit specification

Signed-off-by: Yurii Shynbuiev <yurii.shynbuiev@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Yurii Shynbuiev <yurii.shynbuiev@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Yurii Shynbuiev <yurii.shynbuiev@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Yurii Shynbuiev <yurii.shynbuiev@iohk.io>
Signed-off-by: Yurii Shynbuiev <yurii.shynbuiev@iohk.io>
@yshyn-iohk yshyn-iohk requested a review from a team as a code owner December 10, 2025 07:20
@yshyn-iohk yshyn-iohk marked this pull request as draft December 10, 2025 07:21
@yshyn-iohk yshyn-iohk changed the title WIP: add VDR capabilities to the cloud-agent using the prism-node feat: add VDR capabilities to the cloud-agent using the prism-node Dec 10, 2025
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
9 Security Hotspots

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Integration Test Results

 24 files  ±0   24 suites  ±0   3s ⏱️ ±0s
 61 tests ±0   61 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
113 runs  ±0  113 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit dab7ede. ± Comparison against base commit 6d6a65e.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Results

106 files  ±0  106 suites  ±0   18m 7s ⏱️ - 2m 12s
902 tests +3  894 ✅ +3  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
909 runs  +3  901 ✅ +3  8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit dab7ede. ± Comparison against base commit 6d6a65e.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 47.655% (-0.007%) from 47.662%
when pulling dab7ede on feat/vdr-key
into 6d6a65e on main.

Comment on lines +14 to +16
contents: write
packages: write
id-token: write
Copy link
Contributor

@mineme0110 mineme0110 Dec 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

move this permissions to job level then global

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants