Skip to content

Conversation

@itsyaasir
Copy link
Contributor

Description of change

Links to any relevant issues

Type of change

  • Bug fix (a non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (a non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation Fix

How the change has been tested

Change checklist

  • I have followed the contribution guidelines for this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have checked that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have updated the CHANGELOG.md, if my changes are significant enough

@itsyaasir itsyaasir self-assigned this Dec 17, 2025
chrisgitiota and others added 9 commits December 21, 2025 16:30
* First implementation of the permission module based on a `Permission` enum
* Unit tests for the `Permission` enum
* Renamed `AuditTrail::permissions` to `AuditTrail::roles`
* Renamed all modules and type-names from plural to singular name
  * audit_trails -> audit_trail
  * permissions -> permission
  * capabilities -> capability
Unit tests are still buggy and will be fixed with the next commit.
@itsyaasir itsyaasir marked this pull request as ready for review December 23, 2025 07:56
@itsyaasir itsyaasir changed the title [WIP] : Audit Trails API Audit Trails API Dec 23, 2025
…anagement

Feat/audit trails api roles management
@itsyaasir itsyaasir merged commit e89679a into feat/audit-trails-dev Dec 24, 2025
11 checks passed
@itsyaasir itsyaasir deleted the feat/audit-trails-api branch December 24, 2025 13:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants