Skip to content
Draft
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
886 changes: 886 additions & 0 deletions docs/DOCUMENTATION_REVIEW_EXECUTION_GUIDE.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

765 changes: 765 additions & 0 deletions docs/DOCUMENTATION_REVIEW_FINDINGS.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

475 changes: 475 additions & 0 deletions docs/DOCUMENTATION_REVIEW_PLAN.md

Large diffs are not rendered by default.

199 changes: 199 additions & 0 deletions docs/DOCUMENTATION_REVIEW_README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
# Documentation Review Resources

This directory contains resources for conducting a comprehensive review of ComponentForge documentation against the actual codebase.

## Overview

The documentation review process ensures that all documentation accurately reflects the implemented features, APIs, and architecture of ComponentForge.

## Files in This Directory

### Main Documents

1. **DOCUMENTATION_REVIEW_PLAN.md**
- Comprehensive plan outlining the review methodology
- Defines 10 phases of review
- Success criteria and deliverables
- Estimated timeline: 8-14 hours

2. **DOCUMENTATION_REVIEW_EXECUTION_GUIDE.md**
- Step-by-step guide for executing the review
- Detailed checklists for each phase
- Commands and verification steps
- Tips for efficient review

3. **DOCUMENTATION_REVIEW_FINDINGS.md**
- Template for recording all findings
- Categorized by issue type and severity
- Includes summary statistics and recommendations
- Used to track progress and results

### Scripts

- **scripts/automated-doc-checks.sh**
- Automated checks to identify common issues
- Extracts endpoints, versions, links
- Creates reference files for manual review
- Run first to get baseline data

## Quick Start

### 1. Run Automated Checks

```bash
cd /home/runner/work/component-forge/component-forge
bash docs/scripts/automated-doc-checks.sh
```

This creates:
- `/tmp/doc-review/automated-checks-output.txt` - Full report
- `/tmp/doc-review/doc-inventory.txt` - List of all docs
- `/tmp/doc-review/internal-links.txt` - All internal links
- `/tmp/doc-review/external-links.txt` - All external links

### 2. Follow the Execution Guide

Open `DOCUMENTATION_REVIEW_EXECUTION_GUIDE.md` and follow each phase:

1. **Phase 1**: Structural Analysis
2. **Phase 2**: API Documentation Review
3. **Phase 3**: Backend Architecture Review
4. **Phase 4**: Features Documentation Review
5. **Phase 5**: Frontend Documentation Review
6. **Phase 6**: Getting Started & Setup Review
7. **Phase 7**: Code Examples Review
8. **Phase 8**: Links & Cross-References Review
9. **Phase 9**: Versioning & Dependencies Review

### 3. Record Findings

As you discover issues, record them in `DOCUMENTATION_REVIEW_FINDINGS.md`:

- Use the predefined finding IDs (e.g., API-001, BACKEND-001)
- Categorize by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
- Include current state vs. actual state
- Provide clear recommendations

### 4. Generate Final Report

After completing all phases:

1. Fill in summary statistics
2. Calculate accuracy scores
3. Prioritize action items
4. Create executive summary

## Review Scope

### Documentation Coverage (36 files)

- **API Documentation** (3 files)
- **Architecture** (2 files)
- **Backend Documentation** (8 files)
- **Features** (7 files)
- **Getting Started** (3 files)
- **Testing** (4 files)
- **Deployment & Development** (4 files)
- **ADRs** (2 files)
- **Core Documentation** (3 files)

### Key Review Areas

1. **Accuracy**: Do docs match implementation?
2. **Completeness**: Is everything documented?
3. **Consistency**: Are versions and terminology consistent?
4. **Usability**: Can developers follow the docs?
5. **Currency**: Are examples and versions up to date?

## Review Methodology

### Automated Checks
- Extract documentation inventory
- Map code structure
- Find API endpoints
- Check port numbers
- Verify version consistency
- Validate internal links
- Extract external links
- Check component inventory
- Verify service layer
- Check deprecated modules

### Manual Verification
- Compare documentation with source code
- Test code examples
- Verify API endpoints
- Check cross-references
- Validate configuration examples
- Test setup instructions

## Success Criteria

Review is complete when:

- βœ… All 36 documentation files reviewed
- βœ… All API endpoints verified
- βœ… All backend modules verified
- βœ… All code examples tested
- βœ… All internal links verified
- βœ… All version numbers verified
- βœ… Comprehensive findings document created
- βœ… Priority issues identified

## Output Deliverables

1. **Findings Document** - Complete list of discrepancies with recommendations
2. **Accuracy Report** - Summary statistics and accuracy ratings
3. **Update Recommendations** - Suggested documentation updates

## Timeline Estimate

- **Phase 1-2** (API & Backend): 2-3 hours
- **Phase 3-4** (Features & Frontend): 2-3 hours
- **Phase 5-6** (Setup & Examples): 1-2 hours
- **Phase 7-8** (Links & Versions): 1-2 hours
- **Phase 9** (Testing): 1-2 hours
- **Phase 10** (Documentation): 1-2 hours

**Total**: 8-14 hours of systematic review work

## Tips for Reviewers

1. **Use dual monitors** - Documentation on one side, code on the other
2. **Take notes immediately** - Don't rely on memory
3. **Use search** - Ctrl+F to find references quickly
4. **Test examples** - Don't assume they work
5. **Be systematic** - Follow phases in order
6. **Take breaks** - Accuracy degrades with fatigue

## Questions or Issues?

If you encounter:
- **Ambiguous documentation** - Flag for clarification
- **Missing source code** - May indicate implementation gap
- **Extra source code** - May need documentation
- **Conflicting information** - Record both versions

Add all questions to findings document with "NEEDS CLARIFICATION" tag.

## Contributing to This Process

To improve the review process:

1. Update the execution guide with new checks
2. Add more automated checks to the script
3. Refine finding categories
4. Add examples of good findings
5. Update time estimates based on actual experience

## Related Documentation

- [Main Documentation Index](./README.md)
- [Contributing Guide](./getting-started/contributing.md)
- [Development Workflow](./development-workflow.md)

---

**Last Updated**: 2025-01-08
**Status**: Ready for use
**Owner**: Documentation Team
Loading