Skip to content

Conversation

@toddbaert
Copy link
Member

@guidobrei has consistently attending meetings, offered contributions to the Java SDK and java-contrib, and has been a consistent, high quality reviewer.

This PR promotes him to Java approver.

Thanks so much for all your energy and efforts!

@guidobrei please 👍 or approve this PR to signal your interest in this role.

Note that @guidobrei is from my company, Dynatrace, so we will require an approval from a non-Dynatracer as well.

Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
@toddbaert toddbaert requested review from a team as code owners December 22, 2025 21:03
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @toddbaert, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request formally recognizes @guidobrei's significant contributions and dedication to the OpenFeature project by promoting them to a Java approver. The change involves a straightforward update to the project's configuration file, reflecting their new role and responsibilities within the Java ecosystem.

Highlights

  • Promotion to Java Approver: This pull request promotes @guidobrei to the role of Java approver within the OpenFeature project, recognizing their consistent contributions and high-quality reviews.
  • Configuration Update: The workgroup.yaml file for the sdk-java project has been updated to include @guidobrei in the list of approvers.
  • Acknowledgement of Contributions: @guidobrei's consistent attendance at meetings, contributions to the Java SDK and java-contrib, and high-quality reviews were cited as reasons for this promotion.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly promotes a new Java approver by adding their username to the workgroup.yaml configuration file. The change is accurate and achieves its goal. I have one minor suggestion to improve the long-term maintainability of this file by keeping the list of approvers alphabetically sorted.

@guidobrei
Copy link
Member

Thanks for your trust!

@toddbaert toddbaert merged commit 4100950 into main Dec 23, 2025
2 checks passed
@toddbaert toddbaert deleted the chore/promote-guidobrei branch December 23, 2025 13:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants