Skip to content

Conversation

@xenadmin
Copy link
Contributor

@xenadmin xenadmin commented Mar 3, 2025

PR progress checklist (to be filled in by reviewers)

  • Changes to documentation are appropriate (or tick if not required)
  • Changes to tests are appropriate (or tick if not required)
  • Reviews completed

What type of PR is this?

Primary type

  • [build] Changes related to the build system
  • [chore] Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries such as documentation generation
  • [ci] Changes to the continuous integration configuration
  • [feat] A new feature
  • [fix] A bug fix
  • [perf] A code change that improves performance
  • [refactor] A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • [revert] A change used to revert a previous commit
  • [style] Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc.)

Secondary type

  • [docs] Documentation changes
  • [test] Adding missing or correcting existing tests

Does this PR introduce a BREAKING CHANGE?

No.

Related issues and/or pull requests

Describe the changes you're proposing

feat(proxy_conf): Reworked jinja Template for Zabbix Proxy 6.4

Pillar / config required to test the proposed changes

Debug log showing how the proposed changes work

Documentation checklist

  • Updated the README (e.g. Available states).
  • Updated pillar.example.

Testing checklist

  • Included in Kitchen (i.e. under state_top).
  • Covered by new/existing tests (e.g. InSpec, Serverspec, etc.).
  • Updated the relevant test pillar.

Additional context

@xenadmin xenadmin requested a review from hatifnatt as a code owner March 3, 2025 16:44
@xenadmin
Copy link
Contributor Author

xenadmin commented Mar 3, 2025

@hatifnatt As promised, here is 6.4.

@hatifnatt hatifnatt merged commit 01b29e2 into saltstack-formulas:master Mar 3, 2025
1 of 5 checks passed
@xenadmin xenadmin deleted the patch-4 branch March 4, 2025 08:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants