Skip to content

Conversation

@avishwak
Copy link

@avishwak avishwak commented Jun 9, 2025

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

For Problem 1 (Market Analysis II):
Strengths:

  • The solution correctly uses a CTE to identify the second item sold by each seller.
  • The CASE statement properly handles the comparison between the item brand and favorite brand.
  • The LEFT JOIN ensures all users are included in the results.

Areas for Improvement:

  • The subquery could be simplified by moving the RANK() directly into the CTE without an additional nested query.
  • The column alias '2nd_item_fav_brand' should use standard SQL quoting (either double quotes or square brackets) for better compatibility.
  • Consider adding comments to explain the logic, especially for the ranking part.

For Problem 2 (Tournament Winners):
Strengths:

  • Good use of UNION ALL to combine scores from both player positions.
  • Proper grouping and ranking logic to determine winners.
  • Correct handling of tie-breakers with player_id.

Areas for Improvement:

  • The solution could be more efficient by calculating scores directly in the first CTE without a subquery.
  • The column names in the final SELECT could be more descriptive (e.g., 'winner_id' instead of 'player_id').
  • Consider adding a comment explaining the tie-breaker logic.

General Observations:

  • Both solutions are logically correct and solve the problems effectively.
  • The code is well-structured but could benefit from more consistent formatting (e.g., indentation).
  • The solutions follow SQL best practices but could be slightly more optimized.
  • Edge cases (like users with no sales or matches with null scores) appear to be handled correctly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants