Skip to content

Conversation

@hinduja97
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Correctness:

    • For problem1.py, the solution correctly identifies authors who viewed their own articles by comparing 'author_id' and 'viewer_id', removes duplicates, and returns the sorted result. This appears correct.
    • For problem2.py, the solution correctly identifies tweets with content length greater than 15 characters and returns their tweet IDs. This also appears correct.
  2. Time Complexity:

    • For problem1.py: O(n log n) due to the sort operation, where n is the number of rows in the DataFrame. The filtering and duplicate removal are O(n) operations.
    • For problem2.py: O(n) where n is the number of rows in the DataFrame, as it only involves filtering based on string length.
  3. Space Complexity:

    • For both problems, the space complexity is O(m) where m is the number of rows in the output DataFrame, as new DataFrames are created for the results.
  4. Code Quality:

    • The code is concise but could benefit from better formatting and spacing for improved readability.
    • Variable names like 'df' are not very descriptive. More meaningful names would improve code clarity.
    • The chaining of operations in problem1.py is efficient but could be split into multiple lines for better readability.
    • Both solutions follow a functional approach which is good for pandas operations.
  5. Efficiency:

    • The solutions are already quite efficient for their respective problems.
    • For problem1.py, the sort operation could potentially be avoided if the order isn't strictly required, but since the problem asks for sorted output, this is appropriate.

Areas for Improvement:

  • Add docstrings to explain what each function does.
  • Consider breaking long method chains into multiple lines for better readability.
  • Use more descriptive variable names.
  • Add comments to explain complex operations if necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants