Skip to content

Conversation

@alokusw2
Copy link

@alokusw2 alokusw2 commented Jul 9, 2025

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  1. Correctness:

    • Problem 1 (Article Views I): The solution correctly identifies authors who viewed their own articles by comparing 'author_id' and 'viewer_id', drops duplicates, and returns the result in the required format. This appears correct.
    • Problem 2 (Invalid Tweets): The solution correctly identifies tweets with content length > 15 characters and returns their tweet_ids. This also appears correct.
  2. Time Complexity:

    • Problem 1: O(n) where n is the number of rows in the DataFrame, due to the comparison operation and duplicate removal.
    • Problem 2: O(n) where n is the number of rows in the DataFrame, due to the string length check operation.
  3. Space Complexity:

    • Problem 1: O(k) where k is the number of unique authors who viewed their own articles, as it creates a new DataFrame for the result.
    • Problem 2: O(m) where m is the number of invalid tweets, as it creates a new DataFrame for the result.
  4. Code Quality:

    • Both solutions are concise and use pandas operations effectively.
    • The code is readable and follows Python naming conventions.
    • The solutions could benefit from brief comments explaining the logic, especially for beginners.
    • The formatting is clean, though the problems are separated by excessive whitespace.
  5. Efficiency:

    • Both solutions are already quite efficient for their respective problems.
    • No major optimizations are needed, though for very large DataFrames, vectorized operations (which pandas already uses) are optimal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants