Skip to content

Conversation

@kiran160195
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

The student's solution demonstrates a good understanding of pandas operations and string manipulations. Here's a detailed evaluation:

  1. Correctness:
  • Problem1 (calculate_special_bonus): The solution correctly applies the bonus conditions (name doesn't start with 'M' and odd employee_id) using pandas' where() method. The output format is also correct.
  • Problem2 (fix_names): The solution properly capitalizes names and returns them in the required format.
  • Problem3 (find_patients): The solution correctly identifies patients with diabetes conditions using both startswith() and contains() methods to catch different pattern cases.
  1. Time Complexity:
  • All solutions use pandas vectorized operations which are generally efficient. The operations are O(n) where n is the number of rows in the DataFrame.
  1. Space Complexity:
  • The solutions create new columns or modify existing ones in place, maintaining O(n) space complexity which is optimal.
  1. Code Quality:
  • The code is well-structured and readable.
  • Variable names are appropriate.
  • Proper use of pandas methods and chaining.
  • Could benefit from comments explaining the logic, especially in problem3 where the condition checking is more complex.
  1. Efficiency:
  • Problem1 could potentially use np.where() for slightly better performance, but the current implementation is fine.
  • Problem3's condition checking is optimal as it handles both cases (DIAB1 at start and DIAB1 after space) efficiently.

Areas for improvement:

  • Adding docstrings to explain function purposes and parameters.
  • In problem3, consider adding a comment explaining why both startswith() and contains() are needed.
  • The solutions could include error handling for edge cases (empty DataFrames, null values).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants