Skip to content

Conversation

@kiran160195
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

The student's solution demonstrates a good understanding of pandas operations for ranking and filtering data. Here are some specific observations:

  1. Correctness:
  • Both solutions correctly handle duplicate salaries by dropping duplicates before ranking.
  • The ranking logic using rank(method='dense') is appropriate for this type of problem.
  • Both solutions handle edge cases where there might not be enough unique salaries.
  1. Time Complexity:
  • The operations (drop_duplicates, rank, filtering) are all O(n) or O(n log n) operations, making the overall complexity reasonable for typical datasets.
  1. Space Complexity:
  • The solutions create new DataFrames (for duplicates and ranks) which increases space usage, but this is acceptable for most cases.
  1. Code Quality:
  • The code is generally clean and readable.
  • Variable names could be more descriptive (e.g., 'result' is too generic).
  • The solutions could benefit from consistent formatting (e.g., spacing around operators).
  • The problem2 solution could be simplified to match the style of problem1 (using the same pattern for returning a DataFrame with a single value).
  1. Efficiency:
  • The solutions could potentially be optimized by combining operations or using more pandas built-in functions.
  • For problem2, the condition if len(secondSalary) >=2 could be replaced with a more direct check like in problem1.

Overall, the solutions are correct and demonstrate good pandas skills, but could be improved in terms of consistency and some minor optimizations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants