Skip to content

Conversation

@PurvaT-11
Copy link

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Owner

  • Strengths:
    • The student has correctly implemented the solutions for all three problems.
    • The time and space complexities are accurately stated and match the optimal solutions.
    • The code is well-commented, making it easier to understand the logic.
  • Areas for Improvement:
    • The variable names could be more descriptive to enhance readability (e.g., 'slow' in problem1.py could be 'write_index').
    • The student should ensure that the problem descriptions and solutions are clearly separated to avoid confusion (e.g., problem1.py and problem3.py were not part of the reference solution provided).
    • The comments could be more concise and focused on the key logic rather than repeating the time and space complexity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants