Skip to content

Conversation

@trim21-bot
Copy link
Owner

@trim21-bot trim21-bot commented Mar 13, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
golang.org/x/text require minor v0.20.0 -> v0.24.0

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@trim21-bot trim21-bot force-pushed the renovate/golang.org-x-text-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from 60b6d6a to 6bb3f39 Compare April 11, 2025 19:49
@trim21-bot trim21-bot changed the title fix(deps): update module golang.org/x/text to v0.23.0 fix(deps): update module golang.org/x/text to v0.24.0 Apr 11, 2025
@trim21-bot trim21-bot force-pushed the renovate/golang.org-x-text-0.x branch 2 times, most recently from bf10798 to db66634 Compare April 11, 2025 19:58
@trim21-bot
Copy link
Owner Author

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: go.sum
Command failed: go get -t ./... toolchain@none go@1.21.0 golang.org/x/text@v0.24.0
go: golang.org/x/text@v0.24.0 requires go@1.23.0, not go@1.21.0

@trim21-bot trim21-bot force-pushed the renovate/golang.org-x-text-0.x branch from db66634 to 017382d Compare April 11, 2025 20:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants